Should I or shouldn't I?

[Don Beaver]

So, I've recently fallen in love with the Reverse AT fad that's been sweeping the forums and have decided to have my riser dipped in camo. I'm still trying to decide on whether or not to do the string stop, as well... But, I'm really wrestling with the decision on whether or not to have the cams dipped...

What say you, EAF? Should I... or shouldn't I?

[BlindBuck]

String stop yes, why? It will look better

CAMs no, I wouldn't risk it people I know who have had CAMs done ended up stripping it off.

[Wideback]

I personally wouldn't have the cams dipped but that's just me.

What bow and what camo are going with?

[Don Beaver]

I have a Pulse, but the camo is yet to be determined. I have it narrowed down, but haven't made a definite decision, yet. I want to do something unique, that nobody else has.

[Dv8tion]

Top limb RED, riser WHITE,bottom limb BLUE

[Don Beaver]

Top limb RED, riser WHITE,bottom limb BLUE

Umm, no thanks...

[Maybee-R]

I like the looks of a camo cam. But I would be afraid of the effects. I mean I can change strand counts and loose speed or serving size and it makes a difference. As for the reverse AT Its growing on me. I use to think it was proof of a replaced set of limbs on a bow that broke or was mistreated. "I know its not" but thats what I thought. And for the suppressor arm Yes.

[Perry24]

Suppressor arm - yes
Cams - no

I plan on my next bow being a reverse AT in AP Snow.

[TEXAS 10PT]

If you could get them annodized in camo I'd say yes but film dipping cams is a no no. Voids the warranty too. You probably have alot of access to cams though.

TEXAS

[archer58inPA]

I like the looks of camo cams , but if they are dipped it may cause a problem like Rick and Jeff stated.
HOWEVER, if you can get the dip done with the grooves covered, ( I don't think it should be hard for an expierenced tech) so the string groove tolerences are not affected...I'd do it.